I’ve noticed a trend with romance novels. The man’s economic or social position is always higher than the woman’s. He’s a duke, or a CEO, or something similar. He’s never an average guy.
Now, of course, this is fantasy – but notice that women are being told in these books that they are supposed to go up in status. They are never supposed to “settle”. Equal or lesser than them isn’t OK.
She’s a secretary, and he is the boss.
She’s a nurse, and he is a doctor.
It plays out, over and over.
Meanwhile, guys don’t read these books. They aren’t getting the script.
Perhaps they don’t need to read it. Perhaps they just know, based on our society’s expectations, that they are supposed to marry “beneath” them.
Men are supposed to be the breadwinners.
She’s the artist, and he is the neuroscientist. She’s the amateur writer, and he’s the professor. It is never the other way around.
She has the “fluff” job, the one that doesn’t pay the bills. Her income is extra. He’s the one in charge, and his way goes.
When one person controls the income, they have all the control.
So this is “fantasy”? This is ideal? Why would anybody want to dream about a passive life, where they have no control, no authority? Where things are done to and for them, instead of with?
This is definitely a theme with romance novels, and it can be difficult to find many which break that mold. Have you ever read the book “Dare to Love” by Jaci Burton? The female lead is a lawyer and heiress, the guy has a fledgling construction company. Interesting power dynamic.
LikeLike
But note how rare that is. What are we teaching women – that they are always lesser, always lower?
LikeLike